Monday, February 23, 2009

Which Side is Right?

by Sharon Mann

Israel? Palestine? Neither? Both?

I cannot be the friend of the Israeli, IF I cannot be the friend of the Palestinian. I cannot be the friend to the Palestinian, IF I cannot be the friend to the Israeli. Holding them both and striving to understand their issues makes me realize both have a place in the world.

When traveling in the West Bank a little more than a year ago, what I gained was a perspective of how precious the land is to everyone. The class I traveled with and those I learned from included Arch Bishop Elias Chacour with whom we spent an afternoon studying the issues of the people of Galilee. “This land, this place they arguing over is the home to people”. He went on to describe they are moms, dads, grandmothers, and brothers and sisters and daughters. People, going to the school to work, to the grocery, to the library and to the doctor or to the nurse.

Before you can decide who is right we must look at the argument.

I share with you an email that was forwarded to me from a member in the faith community where I serve. Benjamin Netanyahu, recently elected Prime Minister of Israel, gave an interview and was asked about Israel's occupation of Arab lands entitled, "Crash Course on the Arab Israeli Conflict."

Here are overlooked “facts” in the current circulation concerning the Middle East situation. These were compiled by an unidentified Christian university professor from BRIEF FACTS ON THE ISRAELI CONFLICT TODAY. I have added validation from archived research materials, from various texts of former President Carter and his library where I served a full year as an intern, and WE Belong to the Land by Arch Bishop Elias Chacour, a Palestinian Israeli living for peace and reconciliation. Eye witness to 1947-48 the November 29, 1947 U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181 and the Diaspora that ensued in Palestine with Israel.
The numbered items are statements from the circulated email and the italicized comments the statements which are reconciled with data from the above mentioned sources. “It's our land”...By: Benjamin Netanyahu

1. Nationhood and Jerusalem. Israel became a nation in 1312 Before Common Era (BCE), Two thousand years before the rise of Islam.

2. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 BCE, the Jews have had dominion over the land for one thousand years with a continuous presence in the land for the past 3,300 years.

3. The only Arab dominion since the conquest in 635 CE lasted no more than 22 years.

4. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.

5. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanah, the Jewish Holy Scriptures. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran.

6. King David founded the city of Jerusalem. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem.1870 7,000 Jews in Palestine (2% of population). Large- Scale Zionist (a traditional faith focus) immigration begins in early 20 CE.

1930-46 Jews flee Nazis seek haven in Palestine and all over the world. Land ownership is 92% Palestinian, 8% Jewish. Zionist (a traditional belief focus) forces expel 750,000+ Palestinians or approximately 75% of the population from their homes. Six months into the expulsion Israel declares independence. In 1947 Britain allows the U.N. to decide what to do about Palestine, which is partitioned into Jewish, Arab, and International areas (Jerusalem and Bethlehem) 55% of the Territory is allocated to the Jewish state. Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan are now independent States.

7. (continued) Arab and Jewish Refugees: in 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty-eight percent left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier.

Britain, in 1948 mandated Israel over Palestine and declared Israel’s independence as a nation. Arab armies attacked and Israel prevailed. U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194 establishes a conciliation commission and asserts that refugees wishing to return to their homes AND live in PEACE be allowed to do so, that compensation be paid to others, and that free access to the holy places are assured.

8. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab lands due to Arab brutality, persecution and program.

9. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be around 630,000. The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands is estimated to be the same.

10. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the 100,000,000 refugees since World War II, theirs is the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own people's lands. Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country no larger than the state of New Jersey

11. The Arab-Israeli Conflict: the Arabs are represented by eight separate nations, not including the Palestinians. There is only one Jewish nation. The Arab nations initiated all five wars and lost. Israel defended itself each time and won.

12. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel.
1967 Israel occupies ALL remaining Palestinian lands in Six-Day War. The Occupation has continued for 40+ years.

Was U.N General Assembly Resolution 194 in the above situation honored? (1988)

13. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.

14. The UN Record on Israel and the Arabs: of the 175 Security Council resolutions passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel.

15. Of the 690 General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429 were directed against Israel.

16. The UN was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the Jordanians.

17. The UN was silent while the Jordanians systematically desecrated the ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives.

18. The UN was silent while the Jordanians enforced an apartheid-like a policy of preventing Jews from visiting the Temple Mount and the Western Wall. (During the class trip we were denied access to the Dome of the Rock by Israeli soldiers, our guide was Palestinian, 2008)

Six months later, U.N. Security Council Resolution 242 is passed, confirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of land by force and calling for Israel’s withdrawal from occupied territories, the right of all states in the region to live in peace within secure and recognized borders, and a just solution to the refugee problem.

Palestinian resistance continues, mostly nonviolent, sometimes violent (sadly first suicide bombing occurred in 1994). From that time until now Jews worldwide are invited by Israel to live on the refugees’ land solely on the basis of their religious belief / way of life and their ethnicity.

The data supports many of these claims and refutes others. Research for yourself. When looking at the facts it is important to know the source. Some is easily verified. Credible websites such as Amnesty International, http://www.amnesty.org/, UN OCHA, www.reliefweb.int/hic-opt are both good sites to begin your search for what is RIGHT!

So what is the bottom line?

I believe we must hold both sides of this issue. Why? On a sunny January afternoon 2008, standing on a top floor office overlooking the Mediterranean Sea, Arch Bishop Chacour recounted his story in a clear voice. As a 5-year old boy he watched how the soldiers came to take his father and brothers away from their home. Later, he and his mother and sisters left their olive groves and their home in Gush to live as refugees for the rest of their lives. Why? Ethnicity, religion, skin color.

Which side is RIGHT? BOTH? NEITHER? We must hold both sides for you cannot be a friend to one without being a friend to the other.

7 comments:

  1. Sharon--I agree with you; as children of a loving God, we must hold both sides. Sometimes it's very hard, though. I have spent time with Archbishop Chacour several times and I traveled with the Disciples of Christ Peacemaking Tour last year and slept in a Palestinian refugee camp. It's hard, very hard, not to choose sides. But God doesn't and neither should we.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Which side is RIGHT? BOTH? NEITHER? We must hold both sides for you cannot be a friend to one without being a friend to the other."

    I appreciate this post and while I have never been to Palestine, I do think about this crisis often.

    From my Christian perspective I feel as if it should not be a matter who is right and who is wrong in this conflict, but instead a matter of who is oppressed and who is poor. That, to me, is the question we should be asking ourselves as Americans and certainly as Christians.

    Christ said in Matthew 19:21, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."

    Our call as Christians should not be a matter of distinguishing (judging) between who deserves the land and who doesn’t, but instead seeking out misery and suffering and bringing as much love, care, and kindness as is humanly possible.

    From my perspective, at this moment, those suffering the most are the Palestinians. This is not a political perspective on my part as I disagree with Hamas; however, when I see men, women, and children suffer in abject poverty and destruction, I can only think that it is there, Palestine, where we should be focusing our humanitarian efforts in Christ’s name. I guess, in a way, for the moment, they are the ones who are in the right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In my opinion, simple notions of right and wrong, as you have alluded to, cannot lead to promising solutions to this situation. All parties involved feel they have equal claim to the land. From my admittedly limited perspective it seems that the unwillingness of other Middle Eastern nations to accept Palestinian refugees is another attempt to deny the legitimacy of Israel as a nation. There are no simple solutions to this problem. Given the history of the Jewish people it hardly seems appropriate to begin sanctioning Israel, but clearly the Palestinians have been displaced and now for the most part have little or no land to call home. Sometimes I think it seems morbidly ironic. At the moment and in general I tend to think that the Palestinians deserve the most humanitarian efforts as they are the people with the least power.

    In an unrelated conversation with a classmate, Chris Zeichmann, he mentioned considering power dynamics when looking at situations and asking questions of right and wrong. To me this notion would go a long way in complicated situations such as that of Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am not as informed on this topic as I should be, but I can say that I feel that perhaps what Steven calls for is a needful thing - to see who is suffering and help, somehow, to alleviate that suffering. One of my favorite people is Starhawk. Starhawk is a feminist writer, global justice and earth activist, and founder of the Reclaiming Tradition of Wicca. Last year, Starhawk wrote what I found to be a very moving argument for reconsidering taking "sides" at all. "A Jew by birth and upbringing," she calls herself as she describes her walk through Gaza. The article can be found at: http://www.starhawk.org/activism/activism-writings/israel_palestine/on_gaza12-08.html. I quote Starhawk, from the above mentioned essay, "On Gaza," (c) December 30, 2008: "Out of our own great need and fear and pain, we have often done great harm, and we are called to atone. To atone is to be at one-to stop drawing a circle that includes our tribe and excludes the other, and start drawing a larger circle that takes everyone in."

    Amen

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sharon -- I really appreciated your posting. I have never had the privilege of traveling to that part of the world, so I am grateful for the the commentary of those who have.
    Which side is right? I don't know, but I live with someone who has a definite opinion on the subject. He bases his conclusions on historical background similar to that which you have presented, so I am very familiar with the content.
    Although I might not come to the same conclusion as he after listening to and reading the history, the opinion I DO have is influenced by emotion -- the fact that I have very good friends whose families and heritage line them up on one "side" or the other. And they are friends with each other. That being the case, how could I possibly choose?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sharon. Thank you for your posting. I was interested in your topic. As you know, it is difficult to choose which side is right. So, I agree with you. We need to hold both sides because our lives depend on many situations and times. We cannot know completely which side is right. Moreover, we need to cut off the malice chains which have been formed since the past because our next generation does not need to be charged the past faults. From now, people who are exiting in current time must keep peace and justice for our next generation, and it is the our responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A very precise presentation Sharon :)

    I think that there are 20 arab countires in the world, where palestinaians can live in there peacefully and with most welcomed cheers and hospitality by their arab brothers.

    But few years ago there was a HISTORIC event where an Israeli and Palestinain father gave hand to hand and were asking their leaders for peace, because both of them have lost their young sons durinsg clashes.
    Therefore if people are for peace and if both ISraeli state and palestinian authorities have democratic approach , then what keeps them to come to peace convention???

    ReplyDelete